MONDAY, OCTOBER 19, 2026|No. 19200
News · US · Politics

Elon Musk settles lawsuits regarding voter sweepstakes program

Elon Musk and America PAC have reached a settlement in lawsuits filed by Arizona residents over the legality and transparency of a $1 million voter giveaway program.

The legal dispute over America PAC's voter engagement sweepstakes has reached a settlement.
The legal dispute over America PAC's voter engagement sweepstakes has reached a settlement.
1 sources
Pipeline ingest
3 reads
Positive / Neutral / Negative
1 countries
Related coverage

Elon Musk settles lawsuits over $1 million voter giveaway

Plaintiffs claiming Musk’s $1 million voter lottery was a fraud are settling for an undisclosed sum.

In 2024, Elon Musk promised to give away $1 million a day to a randomly selected registered voter in a swing state. That prompted legal challenges, raised questions about its legality, and drew lawsuits from two Arizona residents claiming the lottery was a fraud. Musk has now agreed to settle the two lawsuits filed in Austin, Texas, though the details of the settlement have not been made public.

The plaintiffs claim that when Musk announced the sweepstakes, he falsely claimed the prizes would be awarded randomly. Philadelphia’s District Attorney sued to stop the giveaway, claiming that Musk was running an illegal lottery. During a hearing, Chris Gober, a representative for Musk’s America PAC, told the judge that “The $1 million recipients are not chosen by chance … We know exactly who will be announced as the $1 million recipient today and tomorrow.”

That directly contradicted Musk’s claim that the drawings were random. The plaintiffs say they never would have signed the petition required to enter the giveaway if they had known it wasn’t random. They accused Musk and America PAC of using it as a ploy to obtain user data and said the petition “places no limitations on America PAC’s use of or sale of the personal data it collects, nor does it provide any additional information about the planned use of data.”

PAN's pipeline reviewed approximately 1 open sources for this article. No human editor reviewed this article before publication.

Related Reads

Show on timeline →

Earlier on PAN

More in News →