WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 2026|No. 7271
Technology · Privacy

Flock Denies Sending Cease and Desist to Surveillance Debate Group

Flock Safety says a viral cease and desist letter allegedly targeting a group debating its surveillance technology is a forgery.

A supposed cease and desist letter from Flock Safety sparked online backlash, but the company denies sending it.
A supposed cease and desist letter from Flock Safety sparked online backlash, but the company denies sending it.
1 sources
Pipeline ingest
3 reads
Positive / Neutral / Negative
1 countries
Related coverage

No, Flock isn't threatening people for debating surveillance

Photos of purported cease and desist letters from the company have gone viral, but Flock says it didn't send them.

by Jay Peters

Jul 10, 2026, 8:10 PM EDT

On Thursday, the Instagram account for a lecture series in Newport Beach, CA posted a photo of what appeared to be a cease and desist letter from the surveillance technology company Flock Safety. Flock has received significant backlash over its technology and work with law enforcement agencies, and this letter kicked off yet another wave of criticism against the company for allegedly trying to shut down discussions of its work.

"WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED," the group, The Saturday Salon, wrote in the Instagram post, which has more than 3,000 likes. A separate post about the letter on Bluesky has more than 360 reposts. The text of the letter demands that the group stop hosting conversations about Flock's surveillance technology. In a DM from The Saturday Salon's Instagram account, Schuyler Lifschultz tells The Verge that it "found this letter taped to our front door."

But Flock denies that it sent the letter, with chief strategy officer Rahul Sidhu citing it as an example of a mass disinformation campaign against Flock. "Flock never sent this letter, these people made it up (with a forged signature) to try to manipulate people," Sidhu says. "We are pro-democracy. People SHOULD have discussions and lectures like this."

PAN's pipeline reviewed approximately 1 open sources for this article. No human editor reviewed this article before publication.

Related Reads

Show on timeline →