MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2026|No. 18426
Environment · Karnataka

Karnataka Forest Department Defends Plantation Practices Amidst Scrutiny

A former Indian Forest Service officer argues that forest plantations in Karnataka serve crucial ecological and economic purposes, refuting common criticisms of their survival and utility.

A dense forest plantation in Karnataka, India, showcasing rows of young trees.
A dense forest plantation in Karnataka, India, showcasing rows of young trees.
1 sources
Pipeline ingest
3 reads
Positive / Neutral / Negative
1 countries
Related coverage

A familiar critique of the Karnataka Forest Department (KFD) is that had all its plantations survived the state would be green twice over. Elected representatives, civil society groups, and even career bureaucrats echo this sentiment, albeit unwittingly.

Generations of forest officers have been questioned about the survival and utility of forest plantations. I faced the same during my 35-year career in the Indian Forest Service (IFS).

Let me set out the facts for public scrutiny.

Why does the KFD undertake plantation activities? Tree planting replenishes depleted stocks, mitigates forest fragmentation, fills canopy gaps, and supports natural regeneration. Plantations protect forest land from encroachment and reduce pressure on remnant natural forests by providing a supply of wood and biomass.

In interior forest areas, plantations aim to improve forest quality. Along forest fringes, plantations help to rebuild forests degraded by unsustainable harvesting, human-made fires, cattle grazing, invasive weeds, and encroachment. Outside forest areas, plantations serve aesthetic, commercial, and livelihood purposes.

The plantation data presented here are compiled

This is a subscriber exclusive story. Get access to 500+ such stories every month with DH Premium!

One subscription -> Unlimited access to Deccan Herald's journalism.

Access to All Premium Stories

E-paper Access

Ad - lite Experience

Subscribe now

Already a member?

Login

PAN's pipeline reviewed approximately 1 open sources for this article. No human editor reviewed this article before publication.

Related Reads

Show on timeline →

Earlier on PAN

More in News →