FRIDAY, JULY 3, 2026|No. 5648
News · Energy · Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico Supreme Court Reasserts Jurisdiction in LUMA Lawsuits

The Puerto Rico Supreme Court has given energy authorities 15 days to respond in lawsuits against LUMA Energy, as the legal battle over the grid operator's contract intensifies.

The Supreme Court building in San Juan, Puerto Rico, where the LUMA Energy case is being heard.
The Supreme Court building in San Juan, Puerto Rico, where the LUMA Energy case is being heard.
1 sources
Pipeline ingest
3 reads
Positive / Neutral / Negative
1 countries
Related coverage

The Supreme Court set a 15-day deadline for the Electric Power Authority (AEE) and the Public-Private Partnerships Authority (AAPP) to present their position on whether that forum should directly resolve their lawsuits against the private operator of the electrical grid, LUMA Energy. This, in light of the counterclaims submitted by the operator in the current venue, the Court of First Instance.

This reactivation of Puerto Rico's courts in this controversy occurs after Judge Laura Taylor Swain refused to retain jurisdiction over the claims after LUMA failed to get them heard in federal court instead of state court. The controversy over whether jurisdiction remains alive is pending in the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston, where LUMA has the support of the Financial Oversight and Management Board (FOMB). But while that is being resolved, federal courts refused to keep the cases on hold, so they were remanded to state court to proceed here.

When that happened, LUMA filed a counterclaim arguing that the government's lawsuits are motivated by electoral political purposes and that Governor Jenniffer González Colón and the suing public corporations have acted in bad faith, with intentional deceit and recklessly, to the total detriment of the public interest.

Following a campaign promise that LUMA would cease to be the private operator of the grid, the government filed two lawsuits that, with some differences in reasoning, essentially make the same point: that when the Pierluisi Urrutia administration extended the supplementary contract under which LUMA operates on the island while AEE's bankruptcy concludes, it did so illegally because it did not have the required vote on the AAPP board.

LUMA has called the lawsuits 'nonsense,' accused the government of acting against its own acts, and warned that canceling the contract would cause costs of $4.5 billion and 'chaos' in the electrical grid.

Once the AEE and AAPP respond, the Supreme Court will decide whether to intervene directly in the lawsuits and whether to consolidate them.

LUMA reinforced its legal team with two former Supreme Court justices, former Chief Justice Federico Hernández Denton and former Associate Justice Edgardo Rivera García. They also announced that they expect to conduct a broad discovery process in which they identify interventions by the Secretary of Governance, Francisco Domenech Fernández, in the proceedings regarding his contract.

PAN's pipeline reviewed approximately 1 open sources for this article. No human editor reviewed this article before publication.

Related Reads

Show on timeline →