FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2026|No. 13756
Energy · Environment

South Africa's Constitutional Court Halts Shell's Wild Coast Oil Exploration

South Africa's highest court has overturned a previous ruling, blocking Shell and Impact Africa from conducting seismic surveys off the country's Wild Coast due to inadequate consultation.

The Constitutional Court in South Africa has blocked Shell's oil exploration plans on the Wild Coast.
The Constitutional Court in South Africa has blocked Shell's oil exploration plans on the Wild Coast.
1 sources
Pipeline ingest
3 reads
Positive / Neutral / Negative
1 countries
Related coverage

South Africa’s Constitutional Court has blocked Shell-led exploration along the country’s Wild Coast, adding another legal setback to an offshore sector already struggling to keep pace with neighboring Namibia.

The country’s highest court on Friday overturned a 2024 Supreme Court of Appeal ruling that had preserved a pathway for Shell and Impact Africa to conduct seismic surveys off South Africa’s east coast under an exploration right granted in 2014.

Local communities and environmental groups had challenged the plans partly on grounds that consultation was inadequate. Justice Jody Kollapen said the Supreme Court of Appeal order was set aside.

Shell said it remained committed to responsible offshore exploration, stakeholder engagement and environmental stewardship.

The ruling does not end Shell’s broader South African ambitions.

The supermajor received environmental authorization last year to drill as many as five ultra-deepwater exploration wells in the Northern Cape Ultra Deep Block off South Africa’s west coast, part of the Orange Basin that extends north into Namibia.

Shell has already made major discoveries on the Namibian side of that basin, where exploration has moved substantially faster.

The company has also been pursuing a 60% operating interest in South Africa’s Block 2C through a proposed farm-in agreement with state-owned PetroSA. Under that deal, Shell would pay a $25 million signing bonus and fund roughly $135 million to $150 million for an initial three-well program. The transfer still requires regulatory approval.

That leaves South Africa in an awkward position.

Its offshore acreage sits alongside one of the world’s most closely watched new exploration regions, but court challenges and permitting disputes have repeatedly delayed work on the South African side of the border.

Shell, meanwhile, has been reducing its downstream exposure in the country while continuing to pursue upstream opportunities. The company moved to sell its South African retail and trading business after previously disposing of its stake in the shuttered Sapref refinery.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com

PAN's pipeline reviewed approximately 1 open sources for this article. No human editor reviewed this article before publication.

Related Reads

Show on timeline →