This weekend, something as unique as a municipal referendum was held on a possible nuclear power establishment in Karlshamn. Very possible, because the company Kärnfull Next has not submitted a formal application but only expressed interest in the location.
Despite the political majority's positive attitude: when the residents got to have their say, it was a resounding no – as many as 60 percent of those who voted do not want any small modular reactors in the neighborhood.
The municipal leadership was disappointed but intends to follow the people's will.
During Sunday's Agenda (SVT 15/6) the nuclear power issue also heated up. The persistent opponent Daniel Helldén (MP) clashed with Energy Minister Ebba Busch (KD), who sees nuclear power as the ultimate solution to all of Sweden's energy problems.
And although there are many question marks surrounding an expansion, not least the financing and the long establishment time, there are municipalities that have given a thumbs up. Of 16 asked, six municipalities have given the green light.
Nuclear power may be necessary for the country's energy supply. But expect debate, one or two municipal vetoes, and perhaps further local referendums.
Among them are Östhammar and Oskarshamn, which is hardly surprising.
Old nuclear power municipalities where residents for generations have had their jobs and income. And where companies in several other ways, as large employers often are, have been an asset to the local communities.
When it comes to wind power establishments, there is no such tradition. The Tidö government has not encouraged construction either, and local opposition from the right-wing parties has been solid.
90 percent of all wind power projects were stopped during 2025. Poor compensation, feared interference in nature, and fear of noise are some of the reasons. The municipal veto is strong and important for municipal self-determination.
But is it good planning to have no renewable backup while waiting for nuclear power?
Energy companies' patience has been tested for up to ten years when planned establishments have been dragged back and forth. A village in northern Hälsingland, Kårböle, stands out. Here, the entire community has seen the benefits, been involved in the whole process – every single screw has come from local entrepreneurs. The money the village gets from wind power will be used for the good of all.
Although the residents of Gävle are positively disposed to nuclear power, the news that the energy company Blykalla is applying to the government to build six small modular nuclear reactors in Norrsundet came as a minor shock to some.
The older residents have not forgotten the Chernobyl accident, and how the unfortunate wind direction meant that the entire Gävle area had to live with the consequences of radioactive fallout for decades.
Nuclear power may be necessary for the country's energy supply. But expect debate, one or two municipal vetoes, and perhaps further local referendums.
