FRIDAY, JULY 3, 2026|No. 5648
Technology · Disinformation

Russian Propaganda Found in AI Chatbot Responses, Watchdog Reports

A watchdog group found that major AI chatbots repeated false Russian narratives one-third of the time, highlighting vulnerabilities in AI training data.

Illustration of AI chatbot interface with Russian flag motifs, representing disinformation concerns.
Illustration of AI chatbot interface with Russian flag motifs, representing disinformation concerns.
1 sources
Pipeline ingest
3 reads
Positive / Neutral / Negative
1 countries
Related coverage

Warning about possible infiltration of Russian propaganda in artificial intelligences

The Kremlin would be indirectly "training" AI tools to give responses in its favor

Officials issued a warning regarding AI: groups linked to Russia would be trying to influence the responses given by artificial intelligence chatbots. This raises strong concern about the information that models could use in the future to generate responses.

According to the organization NewsGuard, pro-Russian websites spread versions according to which Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan allegedly tried to sell the gold from the Amulsar mine at a discount to Turkish companies. The issue is that the information turned out to be completely false; but the worrying thing is that, when asking AI chatbots about the veracity of this information, they responded that it was true.

In the words of Chine Labbé, managing editor and senior vice president of partnerships for Europe and Canada at NewsGuard: "In March 2025, we discovered that in 33% of cases, the main commercial chatbots, including Mistral's chat and OpenAI's ChatGPT, repeated these narratives as verified facts, despite being known false stories that serve the Kremlin's geopolitical interests."

Almost a year later, in January 2026, NewsGuard carried out a new investigation and, although some chatbots seemed to have improved, others continued to spread false information.

How does this strategy work?

The curious thing is that the method they would be using is not linked to hacking systems, but to the massive publication of propaganda content on the internet. As explained by France 24, AI-powered chatbots are probabilistic tools, so they prioritize the most widespread information and not necessarily the most reliable.

Thus, AI models could take this information to train themselves and generate responses to prompts. Specifically, European authorities point to "Pravda" as the pro-Russian propaganda network that would be behind this strategy. The network is made up of several websites that republish content aligned with the Kremlin. Previous investigations by NewsGuard - citing statistics from the non-profit organization American Sunlight Project - maintain that this network produced 3.6 million articles during 2024, with the aim of saturating the internet with disinformation and influencing the responses given by AI models. The organization examined 10 of the main AI chatbots and found that they repeated false narratives of Russian disinformation.

A report cited by Wired had also warned about the same problem, stating that models like ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek and Grok were reproducing Russian state propaganda when asked about the war in Ukraine. The medium cited the Institute of Strategic Dialogue (ISD), which said that Russian propaganda took advantage of "data voids," searches that provide few results, to spread misleading information.

In turn, NBC News noted that it consulted the companies developing the AI chatbots and some responded that they continuously work to improve their systems, reduce hallucinations and prevent them from reproducing false information.

The underlying concern is that the problem may worsen, given that more and more AI assistants consult information on the internet to formulate their responses. This is a concern that is not limited to Russia, but speaks of the new "fake news," a strategy that any actor could exploit to manipulate the responses given by AI models.

PAN's pipeline reviewed approximately 1 open sources for this article. No human editor reviewed this article before publication.

Related Reads

Show on timeline →