FRIDAY, JULY 3, 2026|No. 5622
Technology · Disinformation

Warnings Issued Over Russian Propaganda Infiltrating AI Chatbots

European authorities warn that pro-Russian websites are seeding AI chatbots with false information, with recent tests showing chatbots repeated propaganda in 33% of cases.

An illustration of AI chatbot responses being influenced by propaganda.
An illustration of AI chatbot responses being influenced by propaganda.
1 sources
Pipeline ingest
3 reads
Positive / Neutral / Negative
1 countries
Related coverage

Warnings about possible infiltration of Russian propaganda in artificial intelligences

The Kremlin would be indirectly "training" AI tools to give answers in its favor

June 30, 2026 14:45 3 minutes reading

Officials issued a warning regarding AI: groups linked to Russia would be trying to influence the answers given by AI chatbots. This raises strong concern about the information that models could use in the future to generate responses.

As reported by the organization NewsGuard, pro-Russian websites spread versions according to which Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan tried to sell gold from the Amulsar mine at a discount to Turkish companies. The issue is that the information turned out to be completely false; but what is worrying is that when AI chatbots were asked about the veracity of this information, they responded that it was true.

In the words of Chine Labbé, managing editor and senior vice president of partnerships for Europe and Canada at Newsguard: "In March 2025, we discovered that in 33% of cases, the main commercial chatbots, including Mistral's chat and OpenAI's ChatGPT, repeated these narratives as verified facts, despite knowing they are false stories that serve the Kremlin's geopolitical interests."

Almost a year later, in January 2026, Newsguard conducted a new investigation and, although some chatbots seemed to have improved, others continued to spread false information.

How does this strategy work?

The curious thing is that the method being used is not linked to hacking systems, but rather to the mass publication of propaganda content on the internet. As explained by France 24, AI-powered chatbots are probabilistic tools, so they prioritize the most widespread information and not necessarily the most reliable.

Thus, AI models could take this information to train themselves and generate responses to prompts. Specifically, European authorities point to "Pravda" as the pro-Russian propaganda network behind this strategy. The network is made up of several websites that republish content aligned with the Kremlin. Previous investigations by NewsGuard - citing statistics from the non-profit organization American Sunlight Project - claim that this network produced 3.6 million articles during 2024, with the aim of saturating the internet with disinformation and influencing the answers given by AI models. The organization examined 10 of the main AI chatbots and found that they repeated false narratives of Russian disinformation.

A report cited by Wired had also warned about the same problem, stating that models like ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Grok were reproducing Russian state propaganda when asked about the war in Ukraine. The outlet cited the Institute of Strategic Dialogue (ISD), which said that Russian propaganda took advantage of "data voids," searches that return few results, to spread misleading information.

For its part, NBC News reported that it consulted the companies developing the AI chatbots and some responded that they work continuously to improve their systems, reduce hallucinations, and prevent the reproduction of false information.

The underlying concern is that the problem could worsen, given that more and more AI assistants consult internet information to formulate their responses. This is a concern that is not limited to Russia alone, but speaks to the new "fake news," a strategy that any actor could exploit to manipulate the responses given by AI models.

LA NACION

PAN's pipeline reviewed approximately 1 open sources for this article. No human editor reviewed this article before publication.

Related Reads

Show on timeline →